Responding to criticisms of Williams
An email from Greg Hancock:
I think you are being too hard on Llloyd Williams.
Llloyd said that his chances in becoming Mayor of Cobourg are very slim. I am a supporter of Lloyd and have heard him say this, but he is probably right. In your column in the Cobourg Daily Star you discuss the great advantage that incumbents have, and this is what Llloyd is fighting against. Llloyd may be the only councillor who thinks on his feet ( or even thinks), he may be the only councillor that does his own research and the only one who speaks his mind at council, and he actually listens to delegations. But unfortunately Cobourg has cultivated a don't rock the boat ethos; remember the Town's motto is "Our strength is our Unanimity" and it the council plays this to the hilt.
I have heard Llloyd speak, I have had discussions with him, and I have talked to other electors. Many people who I speak to think that Llloyd would make the best mayor. If they all vote it will give him a chance of winning. One of the charms of Llloyd is that he tells things the way that they are: he does have only a slim chance off winning, so surely it is refreshing to hear a politician tell the truth. Manfred Schumann also has a propensity for the truth, which is often difficult for people to take when they have become used to sugar coated nonentities.
On of your previous blogs was entitled "Williams firing blanks; time to get out heavy artillery". It appears that Lloyd can do nothing right in your book. I think you misunderstand Lloyd, and to certain extent you misunderstand, and underestimate, the electorate. We do not all want to be charmed with nonsense, we do remember the past, and we do want change. Lloyd's campaign, and that of some of the other candidates for change, is not built upon making exciting events for the media but is rather putting out thoughtful brochures that tell things the way that they are, and talking to the electorate. I imagine you do know from Lloyd's campaign literature that he is highly critical of the current mayor and especially that Llloyd champions our local police force. One of the significant events at the Chamber of Commerce's All Candidates' Meeting was that all the candidates now champion our police, if you had listened to Delanty you would have marveled at his hypocrisy.
I am a regular reader of your column and your blog, but I would appreciate some balance and understanding. If you also believe that we need change there are some good things that can be said about Lloyd's platform rather than just criticizing his style.
I think you are being too hard on Llloyd Williams.
Llloyd said that his chances in becoming Mayor of Cobourg are very slim. I am a supporter of Lloyd and have heard him say this, but he is probably right. In your column in the Cobourg Daily Star you discuss the great advantage that incumbents have, and this is what Llloyd is fighting against. Llloyd may be the only councillor who thinks on his feet ( or even thinks), he may be the only councillor that does his own research and the only one who speaks his mind at council, and he actually listens to delegations. But unfortunately Cobourg has cultivated a don't rock the boat ethos; remember the Town's motto is "Our strength is our Unanimity" and it the council plays this to the hilt.
I have heard Llloyd speak, I have had discussions with him, and I have talked to other electors. Many people who I speak to think that Llloyd would make the best mayor. If they all vote it will give him a chance of winning. One of the charms of Llloyd is that he tells things the way that they are: he does have only a slim chance off winning, so surely it is refreshing to hear a politician tell the truth. Manfred Schumann also has a propensity for the truth, which is often difficult for people to take when they have become used to sugar coated nonentities.
On of your previous blogs was entitled "Williams firing blanks; time to get out heavy artillery". It appears that Lloyd can do nothing right in your book. I think you misunderstand Lloyd, and to certain extent you misunderstand, and underestimate, the electorate. We do not all want to be charmed with nonsense, we do remember the past, and we do want change. Lloyd's campaign, and that of some of the other candidates for change, is not built upon making exciting events for the media but is rather putting out thoughtful brochures that tell things the way that they are, and talking to the electorate. I imagine you do know from Lloyd's campaign literature that he is highly critical of the current mayor and especially that Llloyd champions our local police force. One of the significant events at the Chamber of Commerce's All Candidates' Meeting was that all the candidates now champion our police, if you had listened to Delanty you would have marveled at his hypocrisy.
I am a regular reader of your column and your blog, but I would appreciate some balance and understanding. If you also believe that we need change there are some good things that can be said about Lloyd's platform rather than just criticizing his style.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home